Asana vs Teamwork

Asana and Teamwork are both established project management platforms with overlapping feature sets but distinct positioning. Asana, founded in 2008, markets itself as a flexible work management tool with the tagline "Work anytime, anywhere." It targets a broad range of teams — from marketing and product to operations — and offers paid plans starting at $10.99 per user/month. Teamwork, founded a year earlier in 2007, brands itself as "the only PM platform built for client work," making it a natural fit for agencies, consultancies, and service businesses that manage external deliverables. Its paid plans start at $5.99 per user/month, nearly half of Asana's entry price. Both tools offer free tiers, so teams can test-drive either before committing budget.

Feature-for-feature, Asana and Teamwork are remarkably similar. Both provide Kanban boards, Gantt charts, time tracking, file sharing, calendar views, mobile apps, automation, and AI assistant capabilities. The practical differences come down to positioning, integrations, and price.

Teamwork's lower starting price of $5.99 per user/month versus Asana's $10.99 makes it the more budget-friendly option, especially for larger teams where per-seat costs compound quickly. For a 20-person team, that gap means roughly $100/month in savings on Teamwork.

On integrations, the two tools share Slack and Google Drive support, but diverge from there. Asana connects to Adobe Creative Cloud, Salesforce, and Zoom — a lineup that suits creative and sales-driven organizations. Teamwork integrates with HubSpot, Dropbox, and Zapier. The Zapier connection is notable because it opens the door to thousands of third-party apps, giving Teamwork broader extensibility out of the box. HubSpot integration also makes Teamwork appealing to agencies already running client relationships through that CRM.

Teamwork's tagline and product focus lean heavily into client-facing work: billable time tracking, client permissions, and deliverable management are core to its identity. Asana takes a more generalist approach, positioning itself as a cross-functional work platform suitable for internal teams across departments.