Comparison · Updated March 2026
Wrike logo

Wrike vs Evernote

Evernote logo
Reviewed by AppSage Editorial

Quick Answer

Choose Wrike if you manage team projects with deadlines, dependencies, and multiple stakeholders requiring visibility into progress and resource allocation.

Wrike

8/8

features

Evernote

5/8

features

We may earn a commission if you purchase through our links, at no extra cost to you.

Wrike vs Evernote: Wrike is the clear winner for teams needing robust project management capabilities, while Evernote excels for individual note-taking and knowledge management. Wrike is a comprehensive project management platform founded in 2006, designed for teams to plan, track, and deliver projects with features like Kanban boards, Gantt charts, and time tracking. Evernote, established in 2000, is a note-taking and information organization tool built around capturing, storing, and retrieving notes, documents, and ideas across devices. The fundamental difference lies in their core purpose: Wrike orchestrates team workflows and project delivery, while Evernote serves as a personal or small-team knowledge repository. In 2026, both tools offer free plans and mobile applications, but their feature sets target entirely different workplace needs. This comparison examines their pricing models, feature capabilities, integration ecosystems, and ideal use cases to help you choose the right tool for your specific requirements.

Feature-wise, Wrike and Evernote operate in different domains entirely. Wrike delivers comprehensive project management capabilities including Kanban boards, Gantt charts, time tracking, and workflow automation—features essential for team collaboration and project delivery. Evernote lacks these project management tools entirely, focusing instead on note capture, document storage, and information organization. Both platforms offer file sharing, calendar integration, mobile apps, automation features, and AI assistants, but apply these capabilities differently. Wrike's automation streamlines project workflows and task assignments, while Evernote's automation helps organize and categorize notes and documents. Pricing structures reveal another key difference. Wrike charges $9.80 per user per month, making it cost-effective for small teams but potentially expensive as teams scale. A 10-person team would pay $98 monthly for Wrike's paid features. Evernote costs $14.99 per month flat rate, regardless of user count, making it economical for larger groups but pricey for individual users. Both offer free plans: Wrike's free tier supports basic project management for small teams, while Evernote's free plan provides essential note-taking functionality with device and storage limitations. Integration ecosystems show some overlap but different emphases. Wrike connects with Microsoft Teams, Adobe Creative Cloud, Slack, Salesforce, and Google Drive, prioritizing design tools and business platforms that support project workflows. Evernote integrates with Google Drive, Slack, Microsoft Teams, Outlook, and Zapier, focusing on productivity and communication tools that enhance note-taking and information sharing. Use cases distinguish these tools most clearly. Wrike serves marketing teams running campaigns, software development teams managing sprints, creative agencies tracking project timelines, and any group needing structured task management with deadlines and dependencies. Evernote suits individual professionals managing research, sales teams capturing client notes, students organizing study materials, and small teams that need shared knowledge bases without formal project structure.

Which is better: Wrike or Evernote?

Choose Wrike if you manage team projects with deadlines, dependencies, and multiple stakeholders requiring visibility into progress and resource allocation. Its project management features, competitive per-user pricing, and workflow automation make it ideal for marketing teams, development shops, and agencies. Evernote works best for individuals or small teams prioritizing information capture and retrieval over structured project management. For budget-conscious teams under 5 people, Evernote's flat-rate pricing offers better value, especially if note-taking and document organization are primary needs. For feature-heavy power users managing complex projects, Wrike's comprehensive toolkit justifies its per-user cost through improved project delivery and team coordination. For knowledge workers who need robust search and organization capabilities across large volumes of notes and documents, Evernote's specialized features outweigh Wrike's project focus. Bottom line: select Wrike for managing team projects and Evernote for organizing information and knowledge.
Try Wrike Try Evernote

Feature Comparison

Kanban

Wrike
Evernote

Gantt

Wrike
Evernote

Time Tracking

Wrike
Evernote

File Sharing

Wrike
Evernote

Calendar

Wrike
Evernote

Mobile App

Wrike
Evernote

Automation

Wrike
Evernote

AI Assistant

Wrike
Evernote

Pricing Comparison

Wrike

Starting Price
Free from $9.80/mo
Pricing Model
per user/month

Evernote

Starting Price
Free from $14.99/mo
Pricing Model
per month

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Wrike cheaper than Evernote?
For small teams, yes. Wrike costs $9.80 per user monthly, while Evernote charges $14.99 per month flat rate. A 2-person team pays $19.60 for Wrike versus $14.99 for Evernote, but teams with 3+ users find Wrike more expensive. Both offer free plans with basic functionality.
Does Wrike or Evernote have a better free plan?
Both offer capable free plans for different needs. Wrike's free tier includes basic project management features for small teams, while Evernote's free plan provides essential note-taking with device sync limitations. Wrike's free plan better serves teams needing collaboration, while Evernote's suits individual users.
Which has better project management features, Wrike or Evernote?
Wrike dominates project management with Kanban boards, Gantt charts, time tracking, and workflow automation. Evernote has none of these features, focusing entirely on note-taking and document organization. For any project management needs, Wrike is the only viable choice between these two tools.
Which is better for small teams, Wrike or Evernote?
Depends on your primary need. For project coordination, task assignment, and deadline tracking, Wrike serves small teams better with its collaboration features. For sharing notes, documents, and knowledge bases without formal project structure, Evernote's flat-rate pricing and sharing capabilities work well for small groups.
Can I switch from Evernote to Wrike?
Migration requires planning since these tools serve different purposes. You can export notes from Evernote and import them as documents in Wrike, but Wrike doesn't replace Evernote's note-taking functionality. Most users keep both tools, using Wrike for projects and Evernote for notes and research.
Which has better integrations, Wrike or Evernote?
Both integrate with major platforms like Slack, Microsoft Teams, and Google Drive, but target different workflows. Wrike connects with Adobe Creative Cloud and Salesforce for project-focused work, while Evernote integrates with Outlook and Zapier for productivity and automation. Choose based on your primary workflow needs.
Should I use Wrike or Evernote for managing client information?
Use Evernote for capturing and organizing client notes, meeting records, and research materials with its superior search and tagging capabilities. Use Wrike for managing client projects with timelines, deliverables, and team assignments. Many professionals use both tools together for comprehensive client management.

Ready to Get Started?

Wrike

Versatile & robust project management software.

Try Wrike

Evernote

Remember everything and tackle any project.

Try Evernote

Read the Full Reviews